Tags: journals (47)

Sort by: Date / Title / URL

  1. Awesome. Not open access but, at least in the medium term, a positive way to address issues of access to the academic resources necessary to write a great encyclopedia.
  2. Extraordinarily over-detailed description of how to get cited a lot.
  3. Move to article-based metrics people.
  4. Page length distribution.
  5. This, more than anything else, makes me want to reconsider my academic trajectory.
  6. Journal publishing only papers that have been rejected elsewhere.
  7. BLINDER THAN YOU CAN HANDLE
  8. The content of the paper is "Get me off your fucking mailing list" and has many awesome figures.
  9. "Under the rules of the restaurant, scientists, medical professionals and social scientists are eligible for a discount if they have recently published papers in journals that are included on internet databases such as the Science Citation Index and the Social Sciences Citation Index. The paper's impact factor is multiplied by 10 to determine the discount, which can account for as much as 30 percent of the bill."
  10. Awesome Egyption Open Access publisher.
  11. Really nice advice on how to write a good review. Not all (any?) of my reviews have been this good. I'll try to fix that in the future!

First / Previous / Next / Last / Page 1 of 2