Tags: publishing (72)

Sort by: Date / Title / URL

  1. Wow. Cool looking.
  2. Move to article-based metrics people.
  3. ACM is being dragged, kicking and screaming, into the open access world.
  4. Awesome.
  5. "I would estimate that about 80% of the non-academic non-fiction books that I do not find a complete waste of time (i.e. good books in politics, economics etc – I can’t speak to genres that I don’t know) are at least twice as long as they should be." Amen.
  6. Page length distribution.
  7. This, more than anything else, makes me want to reconsider my academic trajectory.
  8. BLINDER THAN YOU CAN HANDLE
  9. "For several years Georgia State was involved in litigation over the fair use doctrine. Specifically a consortium of publishers backed by Oxford, Cambridge and Sage sued Georgia State over copyright violations by many of the faculty. A decision has now been rendered. The Court backed Georgia State in almost every instance, finding no copyright violation. However, the Court did lay down some rules - in particular you can use no more than 10% or one chapter, whichever is shorter, of any book."
  10. The content of the paper is "Get me off your fucking mailing list" and has many awesome figures.
  11. Academics have protested against Elsevier's business practices for years with little effect. These are some of their objections: They charge exorbitantly high prices for subscriptions to individual journals. In the light of these high prices, the only realistic option for many libraries is to agree to buy very large "bundles", which will include many journals that those libraries do not actually want. Elsevier thus makes huge profits by exploiting the fact that some of their journals are essential. They support measures such as SOPA, PIPA and the Research Works Act, that aim to restrict the free exchange of information. The key to all these issues is the right of authors to achieve easily-accessible distribution of their work. If you would like to declare publicly that you will not support any Elsevier journal unless they radically change how they operate, then you can do so by filling in your details on this page.
    updated: 2020-03-13, original: 2012-06-04 to , , , , by mako - Archived Link
  12. "Under the rules of the restaurant, scientists, medical professionals and social scientists are eligible for a discount if they have recently published papers in journals that are included on internet databases such as the Science Citation Index and the Social Sciences Citation Index. The paper's impact factor is multiplied by 10 to determine the discount, which can account for as much as 30 percent of the bill."
  13. New publishing imprint from a major publisher to use only CC works available for free on the Internet at the time of publication. Hal Abelson is on the advisory board.
  14. Inventing the printing press is the easy part. Inventing the market for its products is tough.

First / Previous / Next / Last / Page 1 of 2